Chuck Grassley (@ChuckGrassley) voiced concerns on Twitter about the impact of California’s Prop 12 on pork prices, noting a 20% increase since its enactment after July 1 last year. His post from March 26, 2024, emphasized the strain on both consumers and producers, with California prices remaining above the rising national average. Grassley advocated for the EATS Act to alleviate the financial burden on consumers and support animal agriculture.
Born on September 17, 1933, in New Hartford, Iowa, Grassley has a distinguished career in American politics, notably as a U.S. Senator since 1980. His background in farming during the Great Depression has influenced his conservative values and commitment to public service, including his dedication to bipartisanship and effective legislation.
Social media users responded diversely to Grassley’s tweet, which garnered 12.1K views. Cindy Northcutt (@CindyNorthcutt3) criticized the quality of local meat, attributing it to poor livestock conditions in the Midwest. Jan Lan. (@janlan584) pointed out what they viewed as hypocrisy, referencing financial ties to Chinese pork producers during Trump’s administration. Loretta (@Lorettamomma60) urged Grassley to focus on keeping MRNA vaccines out of meat and to reconsider financial aid to Ukraine. Crosspatch-ish 🇺🇸 (@VictorishB123) highlighted the negative effects on California pork farmers, citing reduced livestock capacity and financial viability due to Prop 12.
As predicted Pork prices increased 20% in California after July 1 last yr—after prop 12. Cali prices r staying above rising natl avg PROP 12 hurts consumers &producers Now we hv data 2backup the pain in ur pocketbook Pass EATS Act to stop the war on breakfast& fight for animal ag
— Chuck Grassley (@ChuckGrassley) March 25, 2024
These reactions reflect a mix of support and criticism, illustrating the complex debate surrounding agricultural policy, economic impact, and political accountability in the context of rising pork prices and legislative actions.